Instructional Design & Online Course Support

University of Wisconsin

  • Home
  • Contributors
  • Course Design
  • Online Teaching
  • Tools & Technology
  • Policies & Procedures

Backwards Design

Posted: December 29, 2016 | Last Modified: March 18, 2022 Leave a Comment

Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe, the authors of Understanding by Design describe their instructional design technique as backwards, and it has come to be one of the most important frameworks in our toolbox. Why backwards? Because unlike the traditional model, in which teachers first think about what they want students to do, Backward Design asks teachers to think about what they want students to learn.

There are three steps to the process.

Step 1: Identify the Desired Results

What do you want students to know, understand, or do by the end of the lesson? These results should point back to the course objectives, but you should also consider the big ideas and theories of the course. What do you want students to remember in five years? What knowledge do they need to carry over to other courses? Think long term impact here, perhaps even the reason you wanted to teach this subject to begin with. Wiggins and McTighe call these results the essential questions of the course, and maintain that their transferability and durability beyond the boundaries of the course are what make them essential.

Step 2: Determine the Acceptable Evidence

How will students demonstrate that they have achieved these desired results? What evidence do you need to see that student understanding has occurred? This is where assessments come in, and feel free to be creative, but remember to match the level of evidence with the level of results. If your results call for students to be able to memorize the formula to determine the elasticity of demand, then the assessment probably shouldn’t be a research paper.

Step 3: Plan Learning Experiences and Instruction

The final step is determining what information and experiences the students need to prepare them to demonstrate achievement of the desired results. In other words, what do you need to teach them? What learning experiences do they need to have? What coaching or mentoring do they need to reach that goal?

Once these steps have been planned out, it’s important to resist the urge to cram more information in around the edges. If something in the course doesn’t help the student meet the results identified in step 1, then it doesn’t belong in the course.

Additional Resources

  • ASCD’s Understanding by Design module
  • Vanderbilt University’s Center for Teaching: Understanding by Design
  • Diversifying the Role Course Content Plays

Filed Under: Course Design Tagged With: Design Fundamentals, Instructor

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

About This Blog

Through the partnerships we form with our instructors, we develop engaging and interactive online courses. Here you’ll find ideas on course design informed by the latest research and teaching strategies that build community and instructor presence. We’ll also we share our experiences with technology, with Canvas, and with administering our online educational programs.

Affiliations



Tags

Academic Integrity Accessibility Announcements Assessment Canvas Copyright Design Fundamentals Discussion EDI Evaluations Extra Credit Feedback Fundamentals Grades Groups Instructor Instructor Presence Kaltura Kaltura Capture Learning Materials Learning Objectives Multimedia Notifications Open Educational Resources (OER) Quick Tips Quizzes Reflection Rubrics Social Presence Student Syllabus Troubleshooting Turnitin Written Assignments

iDocs · Schneider Social Science Hall 115 · University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire College of Business · BIZHELP@uwec.edu

Copyright © 2014-2023 UW-Eau Claire and the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

Copyright © 2023 · Metro Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in